![]() ![]() As such, a broadening understanding of the field will only serve to further collapse categorization. The categorization of Information Ethics as a defined discipline, an applicable practice, a philosophy and a worldview remains constantly in flux due to, what Luciano Floridi terms, ‘philosophical naturalism’. The attempt to establish a unified taxonomy for the field of Information Ethics is both unattainable and unwarranted. It is argued that communication rights in particular serve as a central linchpin in the system of human rights. Three central areas of informational human rights-communication, privacy, and intellectual property-are discussed in detail. ![]() Then the intersections between LIS and human rights are considered. To begin, an overview of human rights conventions and an introduction to human rights theory is provided. This paper surveys the literature at the intersection of LIS and human rights. 22), library and information science (LIS) has a central role in facilitating communication about human rights and ensuring the respect for human rights in information services and systems. As the discipline concerned with “facilitating the effective communication of desired information between human generator and human user” (Belkin, 1975, p. ![]() Often, these interests are expressed in the language of human rights-for example, rights to expression, privacy, and intellectual property. In this global information age, accessing, disseminating, and controlling information is an increasingly important aspect of human life. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |